
OK, so I peeped the new man o' steel this weekend, and I can clearly say I liked it, but I can also see why it wasn't the "smash of the summer" that left the execs at Fox scrambling to decide when X-Men 3 should be released to avoid market dilusion.
I warn you now, if you havent seen it and don't want to know what happens, change the channel.
First off, This was an epic, a 2.5 hour long one. Thinking of teenage boys, which is the largest segment of the summer audience thats a long time to sit still. Not to mention it wasn't a whole lot of action, in comparison to x-men, , batman begins, the matrix trilogy, star wars...pick one. I must say it was great cinematography and effects. This Superman was very graceful, doing alot of "hovering" and slow flying. I did like the flying in the clouds. A few things were technically impossible (like holding up an airplane on it's end) but I'll write that off as "movie magic." Again I will say...NOT ENOUGH ACTION! This movie played more like a drama and one character could fly and stuff. Kinda like that 70's show "Kung Fu" with David Carradine. You watch the whole show for like 1 or 2 fights. There was little "fast action" I mean he flew fast, and a couple of times he moved fast, but it was the one camera shot he's there-look at the other person-then back and he's gone. This wasn't a rock 'em sock 'em action flick, so if thats all you want you'll be disappointed. This is not the movie you walk out of thinking you can fly or you can save the world.
The comparisons to Jesus Christ (Superman a savior) although I could see how one could make the comparison, it aint that deep. There is a scene when he is falling from outer space and his arms are stretched out like Jesus on the cross, but realistically, I think that was just a classic heroic pose, than a "let's make him like Jesus" move. He was floating in space unconscious, how many choices do you have? The speculation that Superman may be gay, I didn't get at all. Well, besides the lock in his hair and the whole tight blue suit with speedos on the outside.
I did appreciate the plot of the movie with the internal drama Superman faced with the issue of "do we really need superman" and Lois Lane "moving on" because he went away, the legacy of his son, etc., etc. All the characters were solid, which makes for a very rich plot, however chalk it up to editing for being slow at times. I really felt that some things could have been left out to move the story along. The story was very mature for a "blockbuster." I think that is also why Pirates of the Carribbean racked up. The choices were "Cars" a cartoon, Superman and Garfield, a corny live action sequel. "Pirates" was more action and cool stuff teens would appreciate. I saw the first Pirates on cable and I thought it was wack, but thats just me. So I guess it was a hit because parents, teens and kids can enjoy it.
There was too much emphasis on the relationship with Lois Lane and the conflict with Cyclops, uh I mean James Marsden whom she is perpetually engaged to. Lex Luthor, played by Kevin Spacey was good, but kinda wierd. He seemed to be very selfish and maniacal. However he didn't seem very evil, something I come to expect from the "dominate the world" type antagonists from comic books. I don't even think Lex killed anybody. Well because of the rating you wouldn't actually see it, but like in X-men, you know when Wolverine killed somebody, or the jedi and so forth. I know Superman isn't quite like those guys, mainly because he is from a different era - 1930's, whereas most of the other comic characters - Spidey, x-men, hellboy, fantastic four, Hulk were all created in the 50's and 60's. Also, unlike the others, Byran Singer's Superman had a great movie to outdo, in the production of the '78 version and in Christopher Reeve's classic portrayal because of what happened to him later in life. Superman also has the other incarnations to dilute the image (Smallville) in addition to certain aspects like how he was born, and grew into his powers have been done to death already - so although that would have been good to see, no need to reinvent the wheel. All these "creators" have different interpretations and as a viewer thats kinda confusing. So if you're a teen or 20-something that likes Smallville, this was a different portrayal.
Some things that didn't help the movie were: the newspaper setting - J Jonah Jameson would beat Perry White down, he didn't really stand out at all. The other reporters in Superman weren't impressive, like in Spider-man. Superman being the only "Super" in the movie, all the other heros had equally super foes to heighten and level the playing field. I can't say it enough, this movie needed more "tricks." The thing with the laser vison melting the falling glass was cool..more stuff like that. Pickup a parking meter and swat a car. Shake somebody's hand and make them kneel, you know testosterone type stunts. Superman is too darn noble.
Something I really don't like about "super-hero" movies is when the mystique is tarnished. So when Lex finds the Fortress of Solitude I'm like WTH? Nobody's supposed to know where that is, let alone find it. Kinda like in Batman Returns when Penguin and his posse raided the batcave and stole the batmobile and stuff, too vulnerable. I know that Lex finding the crystals is the whole plot, but i wish it could have been something else. Then Kitty Kawalski tosses the remaining crystals out the helicopter. So what, Superman can never talk to his Dad again? The Super-son can never meet gramps? Thats wack. There are many things I liked, and many I disliked. I will admit Bryan Singer's choices "worked" but I think I would have done things different, if I could just get past the guards at Warner Brothers.